Wednesday, February 29, 2012

16. The haves and have-nots around us (I)


Google Images
Let’s get verbal for a while, shall we?
This is an invitation for everybody to step into a room whose door has been skilfully masked within the patterns on the walls: it is as if it didn’t exist until you became aware of its being there. Nobody – well, almost nobody – thought about it, simply because it was taken for granted; now, while looking around the room you readily realize there’s a window to this new reality. So, let’s go over to the window and look out: are you in for what will surely turn out to be a breathtaking adventure?
The air in the room is thick with form, use, and meaning. The first strong perfume tickling our nostrils takes the shape of a verb coming to our rescue: the auxiliary! How could we avoid it when we want to talk about things that happened some time in a period from the past up to now, often with present results?! Mark my words: impossible.
(1)               Have you ever been to Australia?
How long have you been together?
Our taxi hasn’t arrived yet.
Other situations are still continuing, although they started in the past: I’ve been waiting for you for half an hour.
But this is not all: we may want to talk about situations in the past and express possibility, desirability, deduction (that is, modality), and this will take us deeper into the wonders wafting in the room:
(2)               I can’t find my umbrella; I must have left it on the train.
Google Images
Now, I know what you’re thinking: why…
  (3)       do I have to go on reading all this [that is, (lack of) obligation]? Well, because it is necessary, not to say obligatory – even if the obligation has been imposed on you. There’s no other way that I know of when you want to…
(4)       have language explained to you (that is, causative); with a little bit of luck, you’ll eventually…
(5)             have a good time (that is, experience something) while reading on!
Last but not least, what about
(6)           having-full-stop” – that is, indeed, a completely different matter, even if we talk about possessing, or owning things, relationships, illnesses – you name it.
And it all comes in one tight package: I have, (s)he/it has, I had, I’ve had, (s)he’s had, I’m having. But things don’t stop there, simply because we have to finish our thoughts every time and, while doing it, new blocks of information must be added if and only if we want to obtain meaning.
Google Images

Saturday, February 25, 2012

15. Wishful Thinking (III)

Google Images
A lot more could be written in entries for this topic, but going on for too long would be unfair vis-à-vis other themes, which are as important as, or even more important than, this one. So, here’s the full advertisement: 
Lie buster - A Miracle of Modern Electronics

<< At last thanks to modern technology, there is a way to find out if people are telling the truth. The Liebuster looks  just like an ordinary watch, but in fact it’s far more than that! In addition to telling the time, it buzzes when it detects a lie. The bigger the lie, the bigger the buzz. You will find it in­valuable whether you're at home or at work. It is by far the smallest, most accurate, lie-detector ever made. It measures the stress in people's voices by means of high-tech microchips. In business negotiations, it will tell you if people are being dishonest with you. At home it can warn you if your girlfriend or boyfriend is lying when they tell you what they did that weekend when you were away on business.
Never before has such an elec­tronic miracle been sold at such a low price. So get yours /one now while stocks last. Hurry! Don't wait / delay! Nobody can do without the Liebuster, the miracle of modern high- tech electronics! >>

Google Images
And now, all things considered, you will find it easier to agree with the fact that the context in which the lie is told is of great significance. A lie told in order not to offend someone’s feelings is by all means less dangerous than one told in order to gain fame, fortune, or glory…

It is for you to decide, after making all the changes and additions necessary to produce a complete dialogue from the words and phrases below.

Example: So/get here/last/Peter.
So you got here at last, Peter.
Google Images
PETER Yes/I be/terribly sorry/late.
(1) …         
JENNY It be/second time/this/happen/last two weeks.
(2) …         
PETER I know/I hope/you/forgive me.
(3) …         
JENNY Well/why/late/this time?
(4) …         
PETER The boss/ask me/work late/again.
(5) …         
JENNY Well/why/you not/phone me?
(6) …                  
PETER I/try to/but/not be/possible.
(7) …         
JENNY What/you mean? You try/tell me/there be/no phones/your office?
(8) …         
PETER Of course/there be/phones/the office/but/ there be/something wrong/them.
(9) … 
Peter & Jenny

Thursday, February 23, 2012

14. Wishful Thinking (II)


Google Images
Hopefully, everybody has tried their own answers and read the common lies people tell (in the poster). So, time to fulfil the promise: let's unveil the best (or most appropriate) answers, according to the text. In this case, all of them are, to a greater or a lesser degree, linked to conclusions based on statistics and, let’s be honest: we live in a world built on statistics for ... as much as nine out of ten of our affirmations – if we include this one, of course!

So, according to the passage, a 'white lie' seems to be a lie told in order to avoid offending someone. Other scenarios have been displayed in the comments to the post, for it is difficult to decide on telling the truth in extreme cases.

Research suggests that women are better at telling less serious lies than men are. I should add that this may well be the topic of a separate blog, so the theme will only partially be tackled.
Google Images: Avoiding confrontation
One reason people sometimes rub their noses when they lie is that the nose is sensitive to physical changes caused by lying. There’s no denying by now that all research has offered sufficient evidence of the fact.

It would appear from the passage that there is no simple way of finding out if someone is lying. No comment.

In fact, why should people insist so much on being told the truth (the whole truth, and nothing but the truth)? Why shouldn’t there be this other alternative (Tell me lies/Tell me sweet little lies/Tell me, tell me lies) which would paint our days in different hues, and make us smile for no particular reason?
Google Images
It seems it’s human nature, and that’s all there is to it. No wonder then that people (and manufacturers) go to great pains to satisfy such a special need, like in the advertisement below:

Saturday, February 18, 2012

13. Wishful Thinking (I)


Google Images
Surely there are quite a few things we wish they changed for the better, but maybe the time is not ripe to see them come true, or – if truth be told – perhaps it is part of the human nature to expect a lot more from the others, when in fact we should begin by remodelling our inner selves.

We all expect to be told the truth – always definite, always ‘the one and only’ (while we could tell a lie, or lies), even more so from the media. We do want to be well informed, even if the ebb and flow of our existence prevents us more often than not form streaming facts and becoming aware of events in all their development; if this were systematic, we would easily be entitled to draw conclusions which clearly separate fact from fiction, or fiction (=lies) from non-fiction.

A journalist’s job is therefore, by definition, to inform; indeed, tens of thousands of reporters worldwide testify to this challenging profession and strive to keep the public updated on the developments of issues that may have just emerged, or other, older conflicts that have gathered momentum.

Google Images
Something along these lines must have happened to Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, the two reporters who, while relying heavily on anonymous sources, uncovered information suggesting knowledge of the break-in at the headquarters of the Watergate office complex, and of the attempts on behalf of the president’s men to cover-up the latter’s implication: the reporters’ dedication led deep into the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and the White House and finally to the president’s compliance to step down.

Google Images
One of the photos that went round the world some thirty years ago, it’s true: but then again it is no simple matter, for he was the only US president to resign in almost two hundred and fifty years of history.

Here is a first set of questions for reflection:

What expressions, or gestures, tell you what the people are thinking?
Can you think of a situation when it might not be a good idea to say exactly what you think?
What kind of people could be described as dishonest?
Does Honesty Always Pay?
[adapted from Success at First Certificate, by Robert O’Neill, Michael Duckworth & Kathy Gude]

What exactly is a lie? Is it anything we say which we know is untrue? Or is it something more than that? For example, suppose a friend wants to borrow some money from you. You say, 'I wish I could help you but I'm short of money myself.' In fact, you are not short of money but your friend is in the habit of not paying his debts and you don't want to hurt his feelings by reminding him of this. Is this really a lie?

Professor Jerald Jellison of the University of Southern California has made a scientific study of lying. According to him, women are better liars than men, particularly when telling a 'white lie', such as when a woman at a party tells another woman that she likes her dress when she really thinks it looks awful. However, this is only one side of the story. Other researchers say that men are more likely to tell more serious lies, such as making a promise which they have no intention of fulfilling. This is the kind of lie politicians and businessmen are supposed to be particularly skilled at: the lie from which the liar hopes to profit or gain in some way.
Google Images
Research has also been done into the way people's behaviour changes in a number of small, apparently unimportant ways when they lie. It has been found that if they are sitting down at the time, they tend to move about in their chairs more than usual. To the trained observer, they are saying, 'I wish I were somewhere else now.' They also tend to touch certain parts of the face more often, in particular the nose. One explanation of this may be that lying causes a slight increase in blood pressure. The tip of the nose is very sensitive to such changes and the increased pressure makes it itch.

Another gesture which gives liars away is what the writer Desmond Morris in his book Manwatching calls ‘the mouth cover’. He says there are several typical forms of this, such as covering part of the mouth with the fingers, touching the upper-lip or putting a finger of the hand at one side of the mouth. Such a gesture can be interpreted as an unconscious attempt on the part of the liar to stop him or herself from lying.

Of course, such gestures as rubbing the nose or covering the mouth, or squirming about in a chair cannot be taken as proof that the speaker is lying. They simply tend to occur more frequently in this situation. It is not one gesture alone that gives the liar away but a whole number of things, and in particular the context in which the lie is told.

Google Images
Choose the best answer.
(1)According to the passage, a 'white lie' seems to be a lie
A that other people believe.
B that other people don't believe.
C told in order to avoid offending someone.
D told in order to gain some advantage.

(2)Research suggests that women
A are better at telling less serious lies than men are.
B generally lie far more than men do.
C make promises they intend to break more often than men do.      
D lie at parties more often than men do.

(3)One reason people sometimes rub their noses when they lie is that
A they wish they were somewhere else.
B the nose is sensitive to physical changes caused by lying.
C they want to cover their mouths.
D they are trying to stop themselves from telling lies.

(4)It would appear from the passage that
A there is no simple way of finding out if someone is lying.
B certain gestures are proof that the speaker is lying.
C certain gestures are proof of lying only if they are repeated frequently.
D people lie in some situations more often than in others.
Google Images

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

12. The inside story of words


Google Images
In anticipation of other such texts with more complex rephrasing, and in the hope that it has whetted your appetite for dictionary work – which is essential for someone who wants to capture meanings – here is the full text on plastic surgery:

<<AMERICAN TEENS AND BODYBUILDERS SEEK COSMETIC IMPROVEMENTS
[Adapted from "The Secret of Life", in Distinction by Mark Foley and Diane Hall]

The Californian obsession with physical perfection is no longer confined to middle-aged women. Across the United States teenagers are going under the knife, financed and encouraged by doting parents who believe bodily perfection to be a more desirable birthday present than a stereo or a car. And in Beverley Hills surgeons have developed a technique by which men no longer have to spend hours in gyms to achieve bulging muscles.
  Tiffany White, a schoolgirl aged seventeen from suburban Los Angeles, never liked her ' chubby cheeks. ‘A lot of people said I looked like Bette Midler and that really bothered me,’ she said. In the old days she would have had to lump it. But this year she joined thousands of other American teenagers in opting for surgery and had the fat vacuumed out and her nose remodelled while she was at it. Once the domain of the rich and vain, aesthetic surgery, as the practitioners prefer to call it, is doing wonders for adolescent self-esteem and making millions for doctors, at the same time prompting qualms among professional bodies.
Teenagers have become a big market for plastic surgery,’ said Dr Martin Sullivan, an Illinois surgeon who says between eight and ten teenagers consult him every month. Some surgeons estimate that teenagers account for 25 per cent of their business. According to the latest figures, last year 117,000 teenagers under eighteen had rhinoplasty (or ‘nose-jobs’). Almost as many had ear-pinning, followed by chin augmentation and then dermabrasion - a sort of sandpapering technique which removes acne scars from the skin. A small but increasing number of Asian teenagers are having blepharoplasty, an eyelid operation which produces a more rounded Caucasian look. The use of silicone muscle to correct deformities has been widespread for some time, but plastic surgeons now report that 20 per cent of their clients are males seeking decorative muscles. In Beverley Hills Dr Mel Bircoll has turned more than fifty puny thoraxes into brawny specimens using a technique which inserts two or three lumps of silicone into the chest through a small nick in the armpit. Aside from chest muscles, surgeons report that the next most popular operation is to the cheeks and jaw. ‘People want the square-featured Schwarzenegger look,’ said Dr Darryl Hodgkinson. While many surgeons do not believe artificial muscles for males will ever catch on in a big way, they are optimistic about the growth prospects for teenage cosmetic surgery. They argue that surgery can help cure the insecurity and the self-consciousness that comes from a lack of self-esteem. >> 
Google Images

Undoubtedly, this is only one of the many articles which tackle the subject of physical perfection. There are also some very good ideas that came up in your posts, among them the importance of the genetic factor; these will be the basis for future posts, and – it goes without saying –aren’t meant to talk you out of posting your comments to any of the articles published so far, on the contrary! Feel free to express your opinion for as many of them as you wish, as many times you like: they will all become threads for future comments. 

But let’s take a little break, shall we? This goes to all those linguists who patiently gather the meaning of words and phrases and foster language along the years so that we, restless consumers of information, may render our ideas more clearly and precisely.

There is at least one hidden story behind each word – well, not really, there are some words with such a long and winding history that it would be practically impossible to keep track of their adventure.

This one goes in memoriam to John Lennon and George Harrison on behalf of Paul McCartney – a song with <simple> lyrics, re-mastered and offered to audiences all over the world: Blackbird, which came as a revelation of what the spirit of togetherness may create in an artist’s rich and powerful inspiration.   
There are two meanings to this song: there’s the actual bird, which may mean something only for those who live close to open spaces (a lot more could be said about the British use of bird for what is known as chick in General American). There’s another, hidden meaning emerging form what inspired Paul to write the song. While on a tour across America, McCartney heard a woman screaming and saw a lot of police cars pulling up. The police had her handcuffed and beaten. An enormous crowd had gathered, and Paul thought the black woman had committed a crime. It turned out that all she did was to sit in the whites’ section. You can notice Paul’s shock in the adjectives he used: dead, dark, sunken, broken, black; they all speak of unfairness. So also, the verbs are powerful vehicles evoking the common history of black people: fly, singing, free, arise, waiting, see. There is also the sound of a foot beating in the background: at McCartney’s insistence, a metronome had to be used, and so evoke footsteps – the marching of all the African Americans along their history. 


Saturday, February 11, 2012

11. Beauty Is in the Eye of the Beholder


A week has passed and I can’t help noticing that the questions in the previous two posts have been left unanswered. Surely it can’t be because there are few good dictionaries around?

The questions were meant to open a new topic, since we all know and comment on the obsession with physical beauty. Marilyn was far from being obsessed with it in the same sense as we use the term today, for she was endowed naturally with beauty by even the most rigorous standards. 
What was a case in point in the previous post had to do with language. Use late in the structure I’m sorry (no comma, no pause!) I’m late and everybody will understand that you apologize for not being punctual, or for not arriving on time.  People who are latecomers arrive late for their appointments, and it seems they can’t help it – that is, latecomers suffer from lateness by definition.
 
But use the same word (as an adjective) before a noun – or a name (as in the case of Marilyn to refer to the actress’s renowned lateness) and the only meaning you will get is that the person has passed away. Needless to say, we could do better than to associate the presenter’s cruel joke with the fact that Marilyn had at the time some eighty days left to live; we might assume instead that he insisted on being “witty” in front of the 15,000 people in the hall, at the same time doing his best to cheer up the president (his brother-in-law) celebrated on the occasion.

Which sends us back in time to where we left the “thread”: dictionary work. Without this invaluable tool, I’m afraid the next two posts will seem a bit obscure. In fact, they are the facets of one of the most highly topical subjects these days: physical perfection.

So, what is your idea of physical beauty?
Is it true that ‘beauty is in the eye of the beholder’ as a former post was trying to prompt you to answer, and has now become the title of the present post?
Do we have a uniform concept of physical perfection?

Few people are born with a ‘perfect’ body. But what does ‘perfect’ mean? Should we take it to mean the Golden Myth of Perfect Proportions in Leonardo da Vinci’s  sketch of the Vitruvian Man?

What happens when people are dissatisfied with their physiques?
You will find out in the article below.

Monday, February 06, 2012

10. Power, Glamour, and Language Traps (II)

It was May 19th, 1962 (that’s almost fifty years ago), and more than 15,000 people were gathered at the old Madison Square Garden to attend a birthday gala – well, not an ordinary one, for we are speaking of none other than the celebration of John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s birthday. Organized ten days before the actual day of his 45th birthday (Tuesday, May 29), it was based on a script – nothing out of the ordinary here, as this has been part of show biz since the beginning of 20th Century entertainment.
Google Images
Several show presenters were scheduled to enact the script. Monroe was to be introduced by English-American actor Peter Lawford – himself a member of a group of actors originally centred on Humphrey Bogart; whether his artistic career is now remembered is of little importance; what really matters, though, is his relation to the protagonist of the gala: brother-in-law to US President JFK, he was perhaps more noted in later years for his off-screen activities as a celebrity than for his acting.

Marilyn sang the traditional "Happy Birthday to You" lyrics, with "Mr. President" inserted as Kennedy's name, and continued the song with a snippet from the classic song, "Thanks for the Memory", for which she had written new lyrics specifically aimed at Kennedy.
Google Images
Thanks, Mr. President
For all the things you've done
The battles that you've won
The way you deal with U.S. Steel
And our problems by the ton
We thank you so much
Sung in a sultry voice, the song cued President Kennedy’s own stage intervention: it enabled him to joke and to allude to Monroe's delivery, her racy dress, and her general image as a sex symbol saying, "I can now retire from politics after having had Happy Birthday sung to me in such a sweet, wholesome way."

But all this happened after Marilyn’s <sweet, wholesome> delivery. What happened before her performance was a number of introductions throughout the night; each time the hall echoed with murmurs of expectation – but she did not appear in the limelight waiting to spot her. Why wouldn’t she?
Apart from having difficulty in remembering lines during production, Marilyn was known to suffer from stage fright, and be late at rehearsals. The actress’s very “flaws” provided Lawford with the momentum of his performance, for they enabled him to make a play on the actress's lateness: as she finally came on stage several hours into the show, he introduced her as the "late Marilyn Monroe".
Needless to say, you’ll have to look words up in a dictionary in order to answer the questions below:
What kind of language play is this?
How do you take the joke?
Do you think that Marilyn knew about it, and accepted it, or – on the contrary – that it was perhaps Lawford’s cherished trump?

Sunday, February 05, 2012

9. Power, Glamour, and Language Traps (I)

First things first:

Who could the woman in the restaurant be?
How would you describe her character?

At the time Harry Patterson (as Jack Higgins) wrote the novel, Marilyn's short, intense life "wasn't exactly news any more," or at least this is what the male character says. What do you think about it?
Google Images

There's a second conversation the man and the woman had - this time on the phone. We are not told what happened after all, but we do have the privilege of hindsight, albeit because we were born after the events recounted in the novel.

You must have already noticed there's a gapped text for Use of English inserted in between the two conversations in the previous post; here's the full version:
<<'You had better decide quickly whether you want the letters or not,' she said. I took another sip/drink of my champagne, and said nothing.
'$100,000 is nothing to pay for them. They're Marilyn's letters! Marilyn Monroe's letters! I can prove that she wrote them!' Her voice was getting/becoming louder and louder. She seemed to have forgotten her fear/suspicion/anxiety that someone might be listening to us. I thought about what/everything she had said. If the letters really were Monroe's, they could be worth that much money or even more. It all depended on what was in them, of course.
   I told her I would have to see the letters first and that I wanted a handwriting expert to examine them as well.
Google Images
  'All right,' she answered. I waited for her to continue. She did. 'But only on one condition.'
'  'What's that?' I asked.
   'I want $10,000 in cash, before anyone sees the letters!'
'I'll have to think about that,' I said.
She got up to go. She had taken only a few bites of the salmon she had ordered.
'All right. I'll get in touch/contact with you tomorrow at your hotel. If you haven't made up your mind by then, the letters go to someone else!'

Google Images
After/When she had left, I asked the waiter if he knew her name.
'Didn't she tell you?' he asked.
'I wouldn't be asking if she had,' I answered.


'Really? Then obviously she didn't want you to know, did she?' he said, casually waving/holding/dropping the bill in front of me.>>

Had it not been for the implications the canons of beauty have in our daily lives, this "old" topic would have stopped right here; but it seems that beauty and the desire to be forever young deserve some more attention as topics of the 21st century. At least that's what turns out from Norma Jean's intense existence, and that's why the title of this blog entry tries to suggest more: that the Marilyn myth is still past forgetting.

Looking forward to your comments from the perspective of the generation gap.

Thursday, February 02, 2012

8. Forever young: the Marilyn myth

The following passage is from the radio adaptation of a novel called Dark side of the street which takes place in Los Angeles.

[Now, what is amazing indeed is that Harry Patterson, the writer, is a prolific author of some sixty best-selling thrillers published under pseudonyms like Martin Fallon, Hugh Marlowe, James Graham, Jack Higgins, and himself. Dark side of the street belongs to the Paul Chavasse series in his Jack Higgins authorship].

The Woman without a Name
Google Images
                                                      
A man and a woman are sitting in an expensive restaurant in Beverly Hills, not far from Hollywood.They are looking at a photograph of two people, which the woman has brought  with her.


A: You know who she is, I suppose.
B: Of course. And the man? Who's he?
A: Carl Earlham. Ever heard of him?
B: No, I'm afraid not.
A: He was one of her favourite photographers. He was her friend...he spent a lot of time with her just before she died, in '62.
B: Where is he now? What's he doing?
A: He's dead. He died last year. I knew him well. Very well. Do you understand?
B: I think so.
A: Well? Are you interested?
B: In what?
A: In using the information in the book you’re writing about her, of course. You are doing some research into her death, aren't you?
B: Yes, but . . . I'm not sure. How did you know I was writing such a book?
A: Someone told me.
B: Who?
A: Just a friend. I have a lot of friends.
B: What's the name of your friend?
A: That doesn't matter! The only thing that matters is whether you want the information or not.
B: What information?
A: It's all in the letters.
B: Letters? What are you talking about?
A: She wrote Earlham several letters before she died. She told him all about things like her relationship with someone very . . .
B: Look. A lot of people say they've got letters like that. And just about everyone in Hollywood can tell stories about what happened just before she died.
A: What I've got isn't a story. I'm not making it up! It's the truth. In her own handwriting. I can prove she wrote the letters. And what's in them is dynamite. Pure dynamite.
B: Are you sure? It isn't exactly news any more, is it? It happened more than 25 years ago.
A: It's still dynamite.
B: How did you get hold of these letters?
A: I told you. I was Earlham's friend. We were . . . very close. He gave me the letters before he died. Well? Do you want to see the letters?
B: That depends.
A: On what?
B: On what you want in return.
A: Money, of course.
Google Images
B: I thought so. How much?
A: $100,000.
B: That's a lot of money.
A: Yes, and it's worth it! Every penny. Look, I hope you understand what I'm offering you. Letters. Her letters. Some of which she wrote only a few days before she died.
B: Yes.
A: Yes? Yes, what?
B: Yes, I understand.