Sunday, January 29, 2012

7. To bug the bugger

It's time to unveil the secrets of the twenty gaps.

Harry Caul (Hackman) is a paranoid surveillance expert running his own company. Caul is obsessed with his own privacy; his apartment is almost bare behind its triple-locked door, he uses pay phones to make calls and claims to have no home telephone, and his office is enclosed in wire mesh in a corner of a much larger warehouse. Caul is utterly professional at work, but he finds personal contact difficult. He is exquisitely uncomfortable in dense crowds and withdrawn and taciturn in more intimate situations; he is also reticent and secretive with work colleagues. He is nondescript in appearance, except for his habit of wearing a translucent plastic raincoat virtually everywhere he goes, even when it is not raining. Despite his insistence that his professional code means that he is not responsible for worrying about the actual content of the conversations he records or the uses to which his clients put his surveillance activities, he is in fact wracked by guilt over a past wiretap job that left three persons dead; his sense of guilt is sharpened by his devout Catholicism. His one hobby is playing along with his favourite jazz records on a tenor saxophone in the privacy of his apartment. 
 

Caul has taken on the task of monitoring a couple's conversation as they walk through crowded Union Square in San Francisco. This challenging task is accomplished, but Caul feels increasingly agonized over his doubts about the actual meaning of the conversation and about what may happen to the couple once the client hears the tape. He plays the tape again and again through the movie, refining its accuracy (by catching one key — though crucially ambiguous — phrase hidden under the sound of a street musician: "He'd kill us if he got the chance") and constantly reinterpreting its meaning in the light of what he knows and what he guesses. 
Caul avoids handing in the tape to the aide of the man who commissioned the surveillance; he then finds himself under increasing pressure from the aide and is himself followed, tricked, and listened in on, the tape eventually stolen from him in a moment when his guard is down. Caul's appalled efforts to forestall tragedy ultimately fail — because, it turns out, the conversation doesn't mean what he thought it did, and the tragedy he anticipated isn't the one that eventually happens. In the final scene of the film, Caul discovers that his own apartment is bugged and gradually takes it to pieces in an unsuccessful effort to discover the bug, eventually destroying everything there (even, after a moment of hesitation, his plastic figurine of the Madonna) except for his beloved tenor saxophone: at the film's end he's left sitting amidst the wreck, blowing a solo.

8 comments:

  1. Although I think Gene Hackman is an experienced actor, he is not one of my favourite ones, because he always appears in the same kind of "spy" movies. As far as I'm concerned, a good actor is the one who can play any kind of role, but maybe I haven't seen enough films starring him to judge!

    Personally, Edward Norton, Morgan Freeman or Charlize Theron are more remarkable actors for me. Could you recomend us/me any not-so-famous film starring them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, there are lots of other, better, and even more good-looking actors than Hackman...But to tell you the truth, it was the film story line that attracted me: by far more inciting than the appearance of the main character. It is by all standards a must for those who are willing to make up for the top...one thousand films ever produced!

      Delete
    2. I love cinema and I´m totally agree with you. I think that Hackman is not a great actor, but I think that he likes this types of films, in my opinion he feels comfortable. Despite this, I think the same thing than Eugenia, in this case the argument is original and attractive, I would like to see the film this weekend.

      Morgan Freeman is my favorite actor, I could recommend you a lot of films of him, but most of my favorites are really famous, for example, the Shawshank Redemption, Driving Miss Daisy, Invictus, The Bucket List, Million dollar baby, Seven, Unforgiven...
      Other less famous are, for example, Lucky number Slevin, Along came spider or "1o items or less", in which he co-stars with Paz Vega.

      I don´t know if you have heard about that, but Morgan Freeman was awarded in the last Golden Globe Awards because of his exceptional career...He´s the best actor I´ve ever seen!!!

      Delete
  2. I´ve always liked the roles played by Gene Hackman in most of his films. Maybe the actor who performs very similar as Gene may be Matt Damon (who is actually the most profitable actor: each dollar pays to Matt bring returns 40 dollars¡).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Talking about cinema, would be a crime not to mention the great actor, director and producer Clint Eastwood.

    He left his mark during the 60s starring the best spaghetti westerns (A Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More, and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly) and during the 70s an the 80s with his Dirty Harry films for playing as San Francisco Police Department Inspector Harry Callahan.

    Moreover, he has a vast list of great films which a cinema lover has the obligation to watch:
    • Both as director and actor, such as Gran Torino, Million Dollar Baby, Unforgiven, Pale Rider, Blood Work, Absolute Power, Sudden Impact, Heartbreak Ridge, Space Cowboys or The Bridges of Madison County.
    • As actor, like all the Dirty Harry films or the Sergio Leone’s Dollars trilogy.
    • Or only as director, as in Mystic River, Changeling (directing Angelina Jolie), Invictus, Letters from Iwo Jima, Flags of Our Fathers, or the recent J. Edgar, which I have already seen.

    He also has received a lot of awards, maybe less than he deserves.

    So, after that, I only can say one thing: Eugenia, for when a publication in your blog about Clint Eastwood?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely after the present topic is over: there's "Power, Glamour, and Language Traps (II), and then there's vocabulary practice. We shall see to it!

      Delete
    2. I´m totally agree with you Guille! Clint Eastwood is the best director ever! I have all his films and I don´t miss any of them at the cinema!!! You should go to see "J.Edgar"...I don´t have enough words to describe how wonderful are his films...

      Delete
  4. Hi everyone,
    It´s my first reply in the blog and I expect it won´t be the last!!!.
    I don´t agree with some of you mates about you said in relation with Gene Hackman. He´been one of the best actors of his generation. He´s won two Oscars, Golden globes,...and he´s performanced lot of films directed by the best directors like Eastwood, De Palma or Arthur Penn,....but it´s not the point!!!.
    This fragment of the movie that can be watched in this blog, keep our attention in supense and the main character (Gene Hackman) is able to make it so real....

    ReplyDelete